summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/sos-code-article6.75/sos/ksynch.c
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'sos-code-article6.75/sos/ksynch.c')
-rw-r--r--sos-code-article6.75/sos/ksynch.c235
1 files changed, 235 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/sos-code-article6.75/sos/ksynch.c b/sos-code-article6.75/sos/ksynch.c
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..edbd800
--- /dev/null
+++ b/sos-code-article6.75/sos/ksynch.c
@@ -0,0 +1,235 @@
+/* Copyright (C) 2004 David Decotigny
+
+ This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or
+ modify it under the terms of the GNU General Public License
+ as published by the Free Software Foundation; either version 2
+ of the License, or (at your option) any later version.
+
+ This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
+ but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
+ MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
+ GNU General Public License for more details.
+
+ You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
+ along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software
+ Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place - Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307,
+ USA.
+*/
+
+
+#include <hwcore/irq.h>
+
+
+#include "ksynch.h"
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_ksema_init(struct sos_ksema *sema, const char *name,
+ int initial_value,
+ sos_kwaitq_ordering_t ordering)
+{
+ sema->value = initial_value;
+ return sos_kwaitq_init(& sema->kwaitq, name, ordering);
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_ksema_dispose(struct sos_ksema *sema)
+{
+ return sos_kwaitq_dispose(& sema->kwaitq);
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_ksema_down(struct sos_ksema *sema,
+ struct sos_time *timeout)
+{
+ sos_ui32_t flags;
+ sos_ret_t retval;
+
+ sos_disable_IRQs(flags);
+ retval = SOS_OK;
+
+ sema->value --;
+ if (sema->value < 0)
+ {
+ /* Wait for somebody to wake us */
+ retval = sos_kwaitq_wait(& sema->kwaitq, timeout);
+
+ /* Something wrong happened (timeout, external wakeup, ...) ? */
+ if (SOS_OK != retval)
+ {
+ /* Yes: pretend we did not ask for the semaphore */
+ sema->value ++;
+ }
+ }
+
+ sos_restore_IRQs(flags);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_ksema_trydown(struct sos_ksema *sema)
+{
+ sos_ui32_t flags;
+ sos_ret_t retval;
+
+ sos_disable_IRQs(flags);
+
+ /* Can we take the semaphore without blocking ? */
+ if (sema->value >= 1)
+ {
+ /* Yes: we take it now */
+ sema->value --;
+ retval = SOS_OK;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* No: we signal it */
+ retval = -SOS_EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ sos_restore_IRQs(flags);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_ksema_up(struct sos_ksema *sema)
+{
+ sos_ui32_t flags;
+ sos_ret_t retval;
+
+ sos_disable_IRQs(flags);
+
+ sema->value ++;
+ retval = sos_kwaitq_wakeup(& sema->kwaitq, 1, SOS_OK);
+
+ sos_restore_IRQs(flags);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_kmutex_init(struct sos_kmutex *mutex, const char *name,
+ sos_kwaitq_ordering_t ordering)
+{
+ mutex->owner = NULL;
+ return sos_kwaitq_init(& mutex->kwaitq, name, ordering);
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_kmutex_dispose(struct sos_kmutex *mutex)
+{
+ return sos_kwaitq_dispose(& mutex->kwaitq);
+}
+
+
+/*
+ * Implementation based on ownership transfer (ie no while()
+ * loop). The only assumption is that the thread awoken by
+ * kmutex_unlock is not suppressed before effectively waking up: in
+ * that case the mutex will be forever locked AND unlockable (by
+ * nobody other than the owner, but this is not natural since this
+ * owner already issued an unlock()...). The same problem happens with
+ * the semaphores, but in a less obvious manner.
+ */
+sos_ret_t sos_kmutex_lock(struct sos_kmutex *mutex,
+ struct sos_time *timeout)
+{
+ __label__ exit_kmutex_lock;
+ sos_ui32_t flags;
+ sos_ret_t retval;
+
+ sos_disable_IRQs(flags);
+ retval = SOS_OK;
+
+ /* Mutex already owned ? */
+ if (NULL != mutex->owner)
+ {
+ /* Owned by us or by someone else ? */
+ if (sos_thread_get_current() == mutex->owner)
+ {
+ /* Owned by us: do nothing */
+ retval = -SOS_EBUSY;
+ goto exit_kmutex_lock;
+ }
+
+ /* Wait for somebody to wake us */
+ retval = sos_kwaitq_wait(& mutex->kwaitq, timeout);
+
+ /* Something wrong happened ? */
+ if (SOS_OK != retval)
+ {
+ goto exit_kmutex_lock;
+ }
+ }
+
+ /* Ok, the mutex is available to us: take it */
+ mutex->owner = sos_thread_get_current();
+
+ exit_kmutex_lock:
+ sos_restore_IRQs(flags);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_kmutex_trylock(struct sos_kmutex *mutex)
+{
+ sos_ui32_t flags;
+ sos_ret_t retval;
+
+ sos_disable_IRQs(flags);
+
+ /* Mutex available to us ? */
+ if (NULL == mutex->owner)
+ {
+ /* Great ! Take it now */
+ mutex->owner = sos_thread_get_current();
+
+ retval = SOS_OK;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /* No: signal it */
+ retval = -SOS_EBUSY;
+ }
+
+ sos_restore_IRQs(flags);
+ return retval;
+}
+
+
+sos_ret_t sos_kmutex_unlock(struct sos_kmutex *mutex)
+{
+ sos_ui32_t flags;
+ sos_ret_t retval;
+
+ sos_disable_IRQs(flags);
+
+ if (sos_thread_get_current() != mutex->owner)
+ retval = -SOS_EPERM;
+
+ else if (sos_kwaitq_is_empty(& mutex->kwaitq))
+ {
+ /*
+ * There is NOT ANY thread waiting => we really mark the mutex
+ * as FREE
+ */
+ mutex->owner = NULL;
+ retval = SOS_OK;
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ /*
+ * There is at least 1 thread waiting => we DO NOT mark the
+ * mutex as free !
+ * Actually, we should have written:
+ * mutex->owner = thread_that_is_woken_up;
+ * But the real Id of the next thread owning the mutex is not
+ * that important. What is important here is that mutex->owner
+ * IS NOT NULL. Otherwise there will be a possibility for the
+ * thread woken up here to have the mutex stolen by a thread
+ * locking the mutex in the meantime.
+ */
+ retval = sos_kwaitq_wakeup(& mutex->kwaitq, 1, SOS_OK);
+ }
+
+ sos_restore_IRQs(flags);
+ return retval;
+}