Semantics and application to program verification

TP1 - Denotational semantics

The goal of this session is to program an interpreter to compute the denotational semantics of a simple language. We will use OCaml.

Language

Start by downloading the package: codeV1.tgz.

The package contains a parser for the language, programmed in OCamlLex and Menhir (lexer.mll and parser.mly). The parser outputs an abstract syntax tree defined in abstract_syntax_tree.ml. A pretty-printer, to print back an abstract syntax tree into the original language, is provided in abstract_syntax_printer.ml. In main.ml, you will find a simple driver that takes a file name passed as argument, parses it, and prints it back. Just typing make should compile the simple driver.

Syntax

The language is a very simple "curly brackets" C-like language. A program is composed of a sequence of statements of the form:

non-standard statements include:

Expressions include: integer arithmetic operators: +, -, *, /, % (modulo); boolean operators: && (and), || (or), ! (negation); integer comparisons <, <=, >, >=. Equality == and disequality != can be used to compare either two integers or two boolean values. Constants include integers, and the boolean constants true and false. Finally, rand(l,h) denotes the non-deterministic interval of integers between the constant l and the constant h. You can use /* ... */ and // comments. You can use parentheses and the operators have their usual precedence.

Unlike C, variables do not need to be declared; they start existing when first assigned a value. There are no local variables nor functions (see the extension part).

Semantics

Variables have no type and can hold either an integer or a boolean value. Subsequently, we do not distinguish statically between boolean and integer expressions: only values have a type. It is an error to use operators with values of the wrong type, such as adding two boolean values. This is detected at run-time, when evaluating the expression in the current environment. Other run-time errors include: divisions and modulos by zero; using a non-boolean value in tests, loops and assert conditions; using a variable that has never been assigned to; asserting a condition that is false; executing the halt statement.

Deterministic semantics

We first consider the deterministic subset of the language, i.e., we ignore the AST_int_rand expression node for now.

Write an interpreter that executes the program by induction on the syntax of statements and expressions; it returns either an environment mapping variables to values, or an error.

You can use the following steps:

  1. Define a type ival for values. It should contain integers, booleans and errors. You can use a string representation for errors, which will give the user some information on the location and cause of the error. To avoid possible overflow in arithmetic, you can use the ZArith OCaml library (its API is similar to that of Int32 and Int64; the module is called Z).
  2. Define a type env for environments. You can use the Map functor from the standard OCaml library to represent mappings from variables to (non-erroneous) values. In addition to such mappings, an env object can also represent an error. The initial environment is an empty map (no variable).
  3. Write an expression evaluation function eval_expr: env -> expr ext -> ival by induction on the syntax of expressions. It returns an error if its env argument is an error (strictness) or if an error is detected in the expression evaluation, which then percolates to the expression root. Avoid using OCaml exceptions to propagate errors in the function: it will only make the construction of the non-deterministic version more painful!
  4. Write a statement evaluation function eval_stat: env -> stat ext -> env. When should the function return an error environment?
  5. Test your interpreter on the programs from the examples directory. Can you detect infinite loops in loop.c, loop2.c, and loop3.c? Under which condition does your interpreter terminate?

new: correction available in interp_det.ml. (The correction uses abstract syntax trees from the extended language in codeV1x.tgz)

Non-deterministic semantics

We now consider the full language including the non-deterministic expression node rand(l,h).

Write an interpreter for this language that outputs the set of all possible environments at the end of the program as well as the set of all errors that can be encountered.

The structure of the interpreter will be similar to the one in the previous question. You can use the following steps:

  1. Define a type ivalset to represent sets of values ival (including errors). You can use OCaml's standard Set functor.
  2. Define a type envset to represent sets of environments (including errors).
  3. Program a function eval_expr: env -> expr ext -> ivalset to evaluate an expression in a single environment and return the set of its possible values in the environment. When encountering a unary node, the operator must be applied to each possible value of its argument expression; you can use iterators such as fold. Binary nodes require nested fold.
  4. Program a filter function filter: envset -> expr ext -> envset that returns the subset of its envset argument that can satisfy the expression, enriched with the errors encountered during the expression evaluation. This function will be useful to model loops, tests and assertions. Remember that an environment can satisfy both an expression and its negation!
  5. Program a generic fixpoint operator fix: ('a -> 'a) -> 'a -> 'a that iterates a function from a base element to reach a fixpoint. Use it then in the semantics of loops.
  6. Test your interpreter on the examples directory, including non-deterministic programs such as gcd_nd.c and loop4.c.

new: correction available in interp_ndet.ml. (The correction uses abstract syntax trees from the extended language in codeV1x.tgz)

Extensions

You will find in codeV1x.tgz an extension of the language with the following additional constructs: variable declarations (global and local), procedures and functions, break and return statements, labels and goto statements. The language is completely backward compatible with the simpler one. The abstract syntax tree also enriches the previous one with new kinds of nodes, so that you can simply reuse your interpreter and extend it to support some or all of the new constructs.



Author: Antoine Miné