From b1ff241de84d4f46d9f522ce096df9c83b355ec3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Quentin Dufour Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2022 17:59:55 +0200 Subject: Add an adjective --- content/blog/2022-ipfs/index.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'content/blog/2022-ipfs') diff --git a/content/blog/2022-ipfs/index.md b/content/blog/2022-ipfs/index.md index 848778d..64695e6 100644 --- a/content/blog/2022-ipfs/index.md +++ b/content/blog/2022-ipfs/index.md @@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ Furthermore, we are not hammering anymore our backend with requests on objects t After discussing with the developpers, it is possible to go even further by running Peergos without IPFS: this is what they do for some of their tests. At the same time, if you increase the size -of a block, you might have a non-federated but efficient end-to-end encrypted "cloud storage" that works over Garage, +of a block, you might have a non-federated but efficient end-to-end encrypted "cloud storage" that works well over Garage, with your clients directly hitting the S3 API! If federation is a hard requirement for your, the next step would be to gradually allowing back our node to connect to the IPFS network, -- cgit v1.2.3