From d75b37b018fc0ce8e3832c8531d9556ff7a345c9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alex Auvolat Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2022 14:23:08 +0100 Subject: Return more info when layout's .check() fails, fix compilation, fix test --- src/rpc/layout.rs | 70 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- src/rpc/system.rs | 6 ++--- 2 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) (limited to 'src/rpc') diff --git a/src/rpc/layout.rs b/src/rpc/layout.rs index 3c80b213..2f4dc129 100644 --- a/src/rpc/layout.rs +++ b/src/rpc/layout.rs @@ -187,11 +187,11 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` self.roles.retain(|(_, _, v)| v.0.is_some()); self.parameters = self.staging_parameters.get().clone(); - let msg = self.calculate_partition_assignation()?; - self.staging_roles.clear(); self.staging_hash = self.calculate_staging_hash(); + let msg = self.calculate_partition_assignation()?; + self.version += 1; Ok((self, msg)) @@ -214,8 +214,8 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` } self.staging_roles.clear(); - self.staging_hash = self.calculate_staging_hash(); self.staging_parameters.update(self.parameters.clone()); + self.staging_hash = self.calculate_staging_hash(); self.version += 1; @@ -310,11 +310,11 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` /// Check a cluster layout for internal consistency /// (assignation, roles, parameters, partition size) /// returns true if consistent, false if error - pub fn check(&self) -> bool { + pub fn check(&self) -> Result<(), String> { // Check that the hash of the staging data is correct let staging_hash = self.calculate_staging_hash(); if staging_hash != self.staging_hash { - return false; + return Err("staging_hash is incorrect".into()); } // Check that node_id_vec contains the correct list of nodes @@ -329,12 +329,17 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` let mut node_id_vec = self.node_id_vec.clone(); node_id_vec.sort(); if expected_nodes != node_id_vec { - return false; + return Err(format!("node_id_vec does not contain the correct set of nodes\nnode_id_vec: {:?}\nexpected: {:?}", node_id_vec, expected_nodes)); } // Check that the assignation data has the correct length - if self.ring_assignation_data.len() != (1 << PARTITION_BITS) * self.replication_factor { - return false; + let expected_assignation_data_len = (1 << PARTITION_BITS) * self.replication_factor; + if self.ring_assignation_data.len() != expected_assignation_data_len { + return Err(format!( + "ring_assignation_data has incorrect length {} instead of {}", + self.ring_assignation_data.len(), + expected_assignation_data_len + )); } // Check that the assigned nodes are correct identifiers @@ -342,12 +347,15 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` // and that role is not the role of a gateway nodes for x in self.ring_assignation_data.iter() { if *x as usize >= self.node_id_vec.len() { - return false; + return Err(format!( + "ring_assignation_data contains invalid node id {}", + *x + )); } let node = self.node_id_vec[*x as usize]; match self.roles.get(&node) { Some(NodeRoleV(Some(x))) if x.capacity.is_some() => (), - _ => return false, + _ => return Err("ring_assignation_data contains id of a gateway node".into()), } } @@ -357,7 +365,7 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` let mut nodes_of_p = self.ring_assignation_data[rf * p..rf * (p + 1)].to_vec(); nodes_of_p.sort(); if nodes_of_p.iter().unique().count() != rf { - return false; + return Err(format!("partition does not contain {} unique node ids", rf)); } // Check that every partition is spread over at least zone_redundancy zones. let mut zones_of_p = nodes_of_p @@ -370,7 +378,10 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` zones_of_p.sort(); let redundancy = self.parameters.zone_redundancy; if zones_of_p.iter().unique().count() < redundancy { - return false; + return Err(format!( + "nodes of partition are in less than {} distinct zones", + redundancy + )); } } @@ -382,8 +393,14 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` for (n, usage) in node_usage.iter().enumerate() { if *usage > 0 { let uuid = self.node_id_vec[n]; - if usage * self.partition_size > self.get_node_capacity(&uuid).unwrap() { - return false; + let partusage = usage * self.partition_size; + let nodecap = self.get_node_capacity(&uuid).unwrap(); + if partusage > nodecap { + return Err(format!( + "node usage ({}) is bigger than node capacity ({})", + usage * self.partition_size, + nodecap + )); } } } @@ -393,12 +410,17 @@ To know the correct value of the new layout version, invoke `garage layout show` let cl2 = self.clone(); let (_, zone_to_id) = cl2.generate_nongateway_zone_ids().unwrap(); match cl2.compute_optimal_partition_size(&zone_to_id) { - Ok(s) if s != self.partition_size => return false, - Err(_) => return false, + Ok(s) if s != self.partition_size => { + return Err(format!( + "partition_size ({}) is different than optimal value ({})", + self.partition_size, s + )) + } + Err(e) => return Err(format!("could not calculate optimal partition size: {}", e)), _ => (), } - true + Ok(()) } } @@ -493,9 +515,9 @@ impl ClusterLayout { // We update the layout structure self.update_ring_from_flow(id_to_zone.len(), &gflow)?; - if !self.check() { + if let Err(e) = self.check() { return Err(Error::Message( - "Critical error: The computed layout happens to be incorrect".into(), + format!("Layout check returned an error: {}\nOriginal result of computation: <<<<\n{}\n>>>>", e, msg.join("\n")) )); } @@ -1062,9 +1084,9 @@ mod tests { ); cl.staging_roles.merge(&update); } - cl.staging_hash = cl.calculate_staging_hash(); cl.staging_parameters .update(LayoutParameters { zone_redundancy }); + cl.staging_hash = cl.calculate_staging_hash(); } #[test] @@ -1081,7 +1103,7 @@ mod tests { let v = cl.version; let (mut cl, msg) = cl.apply_staged_changes(Some(v + 1)).unwrap(); show_msg(&msg); - assert!(cl.check()); + assert_eq!(cl.check(), Ok(())); assert!(matches!(check_against_naive(&cl), Ok(true))); node_id_vec = vec![1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]; @@ -1094,7 +1116,7 @@ mod tests { let v = cl.version; let (mut cl, msg) = cl.apply_staged_changes(Some(v + 1)).unwrap(); show_msg(&msg); - assert!(cl.check()); + assert_eq!(cl.check(), Ok(())); assert!(matches!(check_against_naive(&cl), Ok(true))); node_capacity_vec = vec![4000, 1000, 2000, 7000, 1000, 1000, 2000, 10000, 2000]; @@ -1102,7 +1124,7 @@ mod tests { let v = cl.version; let (mut cl, msg) = cl.apply_staged_changes(Some(v + 1)).unwrap(); show_msg(&msg); - assert!(cl.check()); + assert_eq!(cl.check(), Ok(())); assert!(matches!(check_against_naive(&cl), Ok(true))); node_capacity_vec = vec![ @@ -1112,7 +1134,7 @@ mod tests { let v = cl.version; let (cl, msg) = cl.apply_staged_changes(Some(v + 1)).unwrap(); show_msg(&msg); - assert!(cl.check()); + assert_eq!(cl.check(), Ok(())); assert!(matches!(check_against_naive(&cl), Ok(true))); } } diff --git a/src/rpc/system.rs b/src/rpc/system.rs index d6576f20..224fbabb 100644 --- a/src/rpc/system.rs +++ b/src/rpc/system.rs @@ -565,9 +565,9 @@ impl System { let update_ring = self.update_ring.lock().await; let mut layout: ClusterLayout = self.ring.borrow().layout.clone(); - let prev_layout_check = layout.check(); + let prev_layout_check = layout.check().is_ok(); if layout.merge(adv) { - if prev_layout_check && !layout.check() { + if prev_layout_check && !layout.check().is_ok() { error!("New cluster layout is invalid, discarding."); return Err(Error::Message( "New cluster layout is invalid, discarding.".into(), @@ -620,7 +620,7 @@ impl System { async fn discovery_loop(self: &Arc, mut stop_signal: watch::Receiver) { while !*stop_signal.borrow() { - let not_configured = !self.ring.borrow().layout.check(); + let not_configured = !self.ring.borrow().layout.check().is_ok(); let no_peers = self.fullmesh.get_peer_list().len() < self.replication_factor; let expected_n_nodes = self.ring.borrow().layout.num_nodes(); let bad_peers = self -- cgit v1.2.3