aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorAlex Auvolat <alex@adnab.me>2023-06-14 12:29:52 +0200
committerAlex Auvolat <alex@adnab.me>2023-06-14 12:39:46 +0200
commit39c3738a079f2a18ee1ef378c8f67050eb2f442b (patch)
tree366d1ab878c83c9f38d184f08f4c7de484e17024
parent7169ee6ee661c84acc2847c96cc8afaebf06dc09 (diff)
downloadgarage-39c3738a079f2a18ee1ef378c8f67050eb2f442b.tar.gz
garage-39c3738a079f2a18ee1ef378c8f67050eb2f442b.zip
Add a page about encryption (fix #416)
-rw-r--r--doc/book/cookbook/encryption.md105
1 files changed, 105 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/doc/book/cookbook/encryption.md b/doc/book/cookbook/encryption.md
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..156c54e8
--- /dev/null
+++ b/doc/book/cookbook/encryption.md
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
++++
+title = "Encryption"
+weight = 50
++++
+
+Encryption is a recurring subject when discussing Garage.
+Garage does not handle data encryption by itself, but many things can
+already be done with Garage's current feature set and the existing ecosystem.
+
+This page takes a high level approach to security in general and data encryption
+in particular.
+
+
+# Examining your need for encryption
+
+- Why do you want encryption in Garage?
+
+- What is your threat model? What are you fearing?
+ - A stolen HDD?
+ - A curious administrator?
+ - A malicious administrator?
+ - A remote attacker?
+ - etc.
+
+- What services do you want to protect with encryption?
+ - An existing application? Which one? (eg. Nextcloud)
+ - An application that you are writing
+
+- Any expertise you may have on the subject
+
+This page explains what Garage provides, and how you can improve the situation by yourself
+by adding encryption at different levels.
+
+We would be very curious to know your needs and thougs about ideas such as
+encryption practices and things like key management, as we want Garage to be a
+serious base platform for the developpment of secure, encrypted applications.
+Do not hesitate to come talk to us if you have any thoughts or questions on the
+subject.
+
+
+# Capabilities provided by Garage
+
+## Traffic is encrypted between Garage nodes
+
+RPCs between Garage nodes are encrypted. More specifically, contrary to many
+distributed software, it is impossible in Garage to have clear-text RPC. We
+use the [kuska handshake](https://github.com/Kuska-ssb/handshake) library which
+implements a protocol that has been clearly reviewed, Secure ScuttleButt's
+Secret Handshake protocol. This is why setting a `rpc_secret` is mandatory,
+and that's also why your nodes have super long identifiers.
+
+## Encrypting traffic between a Garage node and your client
+
+HTTP API endpoints provided by Garage are in clear text.
+You have multiple options to have encryption between your client and a node:
+
+ - Setup a reverse proxy with TLS / ACME / Let's encrypt
+ - Setup a Garage gateway locally, and only contact the garage daemon on `localhost`
+ - Only contact your Garage daemon over a secure, encrypted overlay network such as Wireguard
+
+## Garage stores data in plain text on the filesystem
+
+Garage does not handle data encryption at rest by itself, and instead delegates
+to the user to add encryption, either at the storage layer (LUKS, etc) or on
+the client side (or both). There are no current plans to add data encryption
+directly in Garage.
+
+Implementing data encryption directly in Garage might make things simpler for
+end users, but also raises many more questions, especially around key
+management: for encryption of data, where could Garage get the encryption keys
+from ? If we encrypt data but keep the keys in a plaintext file next to them,
+it's useless. We probably don't want to have to manage secrets in garage as it
+would be very hard to do in a secure way. Maybe integrate with an external
+system such as Hashicorp Vault?
+
+
+# Adding data encryption using external tools
+
+## Encrypting data at rest
+
+Protects against the following threats:
+
+- Stolen HDD
+
+Crucially, does not protect againt malicious sysadmins or remote attackers that
+might gain access to your servers.
+
+Methods include full-disk encryption with tools such as LUKS.
+
+## Encrypting data on the client side
+
+Protects againt the following threats:
+
+- A honest-but-curious administrator
+- A malicious administrator that tries to corrupt your data
+- A remote attacker that can read your server's data
+
+Implementations are very specific to the various applications. Examples:
+
+- Matrix: uses the OLM protocol for E2EE of user messages. Media files stored
+ in Matrix are probably encrypted using symmetric encryption, with a key that is
+ distributed in the end-to-end encrypted message that contains the link to the object.
+
+- Aerogramme: use the user's password as a key to decrypt data in the user's bucket
+